WELCOME

The White House appears to be looking to make the

Sept. 6, 2018 by Catherine Pope

The White House appears to be looking to make the group more politically correct, as the Trump administration has previously done. As BuzzFeed reports, the White House has already spent $4 million to run a campaign that will focus on the group's findings on the health of the planet.

President Trump's "war on science" may be an important one, given its roots in science denial. After all, the United States is the world's leading democracy, and its science was the centerpiece of Bill Clinton's first foreign policy. But his administration is also making a concerted effort to put science in place that will challenge the Trump administration's worldview.

It's not just Trump's administration who are taking a hard line on science. Trump's cabinet is also reportedly considering a plan to build a national library of the scientific literature on climate change. The White House has also set up a website called "America's Science Library."

The new plan does not appear to be at odds with the policy of the Obama administration that the White House has previously criticized. In 2014, the conservative website The Hill reported that the Obama administration had proposed establishing a National Science Foundation to build on science for public consumption. The plan was met with an outcry, as those who fought against it were publicly accused of being funded by the fossil fuel industry.

As a result of the controversy, the White House has started using the National Science Foundation to promote energy conservation and climate change advocacy. The website is currently going under the names Renewable Energy for America, and Climate Action for America.

The White House is also reportedly attempting to build a new website called Climate Change for America. But this is not the first time in recent years that the White House has made efforts to create a propaganda campaign about climate change. In 2011, White House adviser Dan Pfeiffer proposed to create a site called "The Climate Change Blog," which would be designed to promote the "climate-change denier," who would try to convince people to believe that there is no evidence to support climate change. The website was subsequently banned from use.