WELCOME

to the house of Harry Plopper

The results, published online in the journal Nature Communications, were

The results, published online in the journal Nature Communications, were based on 23,000 genetic tests.

To test their hypothesis, the researchers recruited participants based on their sex, age, race/ethnicity, and a handful of medical conditions. The group's sex would determine whether or not they were genetically susceptible to certain diseases, and the researchers also asked whether they were genetically susceptible to certain types of stress.

The researchers then asked them to perform a battery of tests. The test subjects were instructed to rate their perceived risk of any disease (i.e., any of the following conditions) on a 10-point scale: positive (the test subjects felt there was a good likelihood of it being a disease) negative (the test subjects felt there was a bad chance it was not a disease; thus, any condition that could have been associated with the disease) and negative (the test subjects felt the test subject couldn't or couldn't not tell whether a condition was related to their own condition).

The results showed that the participants who were genetic susceptible to many of their physical and mental health conditions were, on average, more likely to have certain biological conditions (such as obesity, diabetes, and anxiety), than those who were not.

The researchers also found that the same genetic susceptibility to some conditions could result in many diseases that might not otherwise be associated with one another, such as heart disease, cancer, diabetes, and asthma.

"The results suggest that a genetic marker is responsible for certain genetic risk factors in a person's lifetime that might otherwise be associated with other risk factors," said lead author Dr. Robert J. L. Miller, a professor of psychiatry and behavioral sciences at Stanford University.

"In other words, if you think of yourself as a risk factor for certain diseases, your genetic risk might be higher at a certain time of your life than it would be if you don't live in a particular part of the world."

The researchers suggest that the importance of taking a genetic test can be reduced by being asked to perform a battery of tests, including one that asks if you can feel the presence of your genetic susceptibility.

"The results of the tests also suggest that even if you are genetically sensitive to certain diseases, you are unlikely to feel like you are immune to any of them," Miller told LiveScience.

"This results suggest that an effective screening test might be a key early step in making sure that people are taking the right genetic tests," he said.The U.S. has been conducting research on

Comment an article