WELCOME
to the house of Harry Plopper
The results are striking. People are more likely to have
The results are striking. People are more likely to have a higher level of educational attainment if they have a higher level of exposure to air pollution from coal plants. This is the third finding that has not been replicated in similar studies of the same group. The results show that high levels of exposure may cause asthma, bronchitis, and inflammation. The researchers argue that the lack of a correlation between air pollution and a person's performance is what leads to their being considered "low risk."
This is the study that may finally raise the question: In the absence of high-level exposure, do people who live in the countryside and lack high-level exposure to air pollution have a higher risk of lung cancer?
In an article published in the journal Environmental Health Perspectives, the researchers explain their finding that the risk of lung cancer from coal burning is lower than that from other sources.
The researchers found that the most common cause of lung cancer in urban residents is the burning of coal. A study of the Lung Cancer Study of Japan found that 80 percent of lung cancer cases were caused by cigarette smoking; it was also found that 40 percent of lung cancer cases were caused by other exposures.
The researchers also found that exposure to air pollution from coal also increases the risk of breast cancer in women. The researchers conclude:
The findings of this study offer the first evidence to date that the environmental impact of coal combustion, combined with the environmental health impact of air pollution, may be responsible for the substantial lung cancer mortality in rural Japan.
The researchers' findings offer a new perspective on the health and health effects of air pollution.
Researchers conducted a study of children who were exposed to air pollution in Japan during the 1960s, 1970s, and 1980s. They studied children in the urban core for five years before reporting their results to the National Agency for Health Statistics. At the end of the study, they tested children in the countryside for the first few years of life before reporting their findings. Children from rural areas were not at increased risk of lung cancer.
The paper is currently under construction.
It is not all bad news for the air pollution question. The researchers say the results suggest that more and more people living in the countryside may have higher levels of air pollution than if they were exposed to less.
According to the National Agency for Health Statistics, a study in 2009 found that in 2010, the global average for children of both sexes aged between 8 and 17 was 1.5 times higher than that of their counterparts from other countries.
Comment an article