WELCOME

SpaceX has said publicly that it expects to be able

Feb. 23, 2017 by James Ashley

SpaceX has said publicly that it expects to be able to land three more Falcon 9 launch vehicles and three Falcon 9 booster orders in the second half of 2015.

SpaceX's next Falcon 9 launch, a three-stage Falcon 9 "R" will land on Nov. 20 at 10:01am ET. It will be the first of three Falcon 9 launches in four weeks.

SpaceX's next Falcon 9 launch, a three-stage Falcon 9 "M" will land on Dec. 1 at about 5:15pm ET.

SpaceX also had a successful test flight of its new Falcon Heavy rocket, which is expected to land at Kennedy Space Center in Florida on Nov. 6 and have a launch window of about nine months.

If you enjoy the content at iBankCoin, please follow us on TwitterOn October 24, 2013, the State of Alabama sent its first "religious liberty" letter to the U.S. Department of Justice. The letter states:

"I know that Alabama has a unique history of discrimination when it comes to religious freedom and that our religious freedom is a matter of public concern for our society.

As a state, Alabama has consistently supported a variety of religious views and beliefs. But as a nation, we do not have enough religious freedom protections to ensure that our public accommodations, services, and services are open for all.

We need to be clear that when an individual who has a religious viewpoint has an important role in our community, they are not entitled to religious accommodations, services, or services that are consistent with their religion."

Alabama's First Amendment Rights to Religious Freedom

It is a clear case.

The Alabama Constitution states that "Congress shall have Power not to make laws, inconsistent with the Constitution, except to the greatest extent necessary to direct the Government against a Religion . . . ."

In practice, and on the ground that the Alabama Constitution does not provide any guarantees of privacy or religious freedom, the "religious liberty" clause is a central tenet of this case.

The Alabama Supreme Court held,

"There is a strong case as to the validity of the prohibition that a private individual may discriminate against a public accommodation, service, or service as a result of a belief system or belief system that he is Christian, Jewish or Christian.

This Court is not in favor of a blanket prohibition of all religious freedom, but in favor of a blanket prohibition of discrimination based on those beliefs and beliefs."