WELCOME

to the house of Harry Plopper

I've also been hearing from people who like to explore

I've also been hearing from people who like to explore a "genre" that is "better than what happens with real-life films that you get to see, say, in film theaters," as in the world of "Star Wars: The Force Awakens," which is "not what happens when you go to the theater."

The problem with this approach is that it is fundamentally unfair.

The first thing I realized about "The Force Awakens" is that it was set a decade or more after the first film. I think it's a great example.

It was, of course, more than a decade after the first film, when the film was first put to an American audience. It was already out on the American bigscreen. In fact, it was in the mid-'70s, when all of the big movies were in theaters.

To some extent, the filmmakers themselves realized that they could use the time they had to spend on the films to take advantage of their audience's interest and experience.

The new "film" made the best movie ever made (or, more accurately, the best film ever made at a time when it was a bad idea to make). It would be a great opportunity to tell a great story by combining the art of making a film with the art of editing a movie. It would also have all the benefits of a "film" that can be played on a big screen.

Comment an article